OWA Yagi Versus Low Impedance Yagi

I am very much a fan of the OWA (Optimised Wide-band Array) Yagi as the benefits far out weigh the negatives. For the the narrow minded (or serious DX'er with no other consideration other than Gain and Front to Back Ratio)  the low impedance antenna is the way to go. Below I have listed the benefits and negatives of each.

What are the OWA benefits?

Whilst it is highlighted else where on this site, I have presented the main benefits of an OWA antenna below:

• Wide Bandwidth meaning one antenna and service large portions (or all) of the required band
• Very low SWR meaning minimum return losses
• Near 50 Ohm impedance and therefore limited radiation or losses in 50 Ohm feed coax
• No Matching arrangement at the feed point of the antenna meaning easy construction with direct coaxal feed
• Having no match, no power limits for the antenna. Power input is limited by the feed coax only
• Very easy construction and self build capabilities as a result of the above
• Last and maybe most important - Due to its design, small errors when building WILL NOT drastically affect final performance
• Minimal losses, maximum radiation efficiency

What are the OWA Negatives

Well there are only two but fundamental ones. Forward gain and front to back ratio. Front to back being a really big issue with antennas with less than 4 elements. But, is this really such a big dis-advantage? With the very low loses seen with an OWA and the matching and narrow (shifting) bandwidth of the low impedance antennas, whilst it may not make a huge difference to Front to back ratio, is there really a big difference in forward gain?

What are the benefits low impedance Yagi?

• Better on paper forward gain over an OWA per metre boom length
• Far superior front to back ratio especially on antennas with 4 elements or less

What are the low impedance Yagi negatives?

• Narrow bandwidth
• Very small acceptable VSWR curve
• Has a tendency for tuning to be affected by close by object such as houses, other antennas etc
• Affected quite often by changing weather conditions, rain playing a big prt in moving or altering the tuning of the antenna
• Small errors in construction will result in an in-effective antenna system
• Matching arrangement required
• If matching arrangement is installed without testing the antenna first, major errors could be hidden by the match device and performance lost
• losses in matching arrangements are hard to measure and calculate. These losses could result in forward gain being no better than an OWA

So is there an alternative to the OWA and Low Impedance Yagi?

YES, the new G0KSC LWA (Low Impedance Wide-band Array) Yagi. This range of antennas have been designed to carry all the benefits of the OWA plus include the forward gain and front to back properties of the low impedance Yagi. How can this be done? The antennas have been designed with a feed impedance of 28 Ohms. The feed impedance has become popular by the use of the K6STI program Yagi Optimizer which optimises Yagi designs for best performance. Within YO these antennas normally finish up around 28 Ohms. DK7ZB being one such user has made this design very popular and has enhance popularity with a simple coaxial matching unit bringing the feed point (at the match) to near 50 Ohms.

The G0KSC LWA designs use this simple DK7ZB match arrangement to match a 28 Ohm antenna that has been optimised for wide-band use. In so doing, the Yagi loses the 'twitchy' nature of the low impedance antenna and adopts the many benefits of a traditional OWA Yagi with just a very small shortfall in forward gain and front to back ratio. 

Interested in taking a look? The first designs are coming online now. If you have a particular design you are looking for, mail me with your requirements and I will see what I can do.

73 Justin G0KSC

This is a short introduction into the OWA quad antenna of which I have listed several designs on this site. OWA (Optimised Wideband Array) is not normally a term associated with Quad antennas as these antennas tend to be very narrow band and hence have to be specifically placed within a portion of the band the Ham wants to use. I decided it would be extremely useful if a quad could be modeled which was able to show the performance benefits of the traditional quad antenna whilst adopting the associated benefits of the OWA yagi.

Enter the G0KSC OWA Quad!

What are the OWA benefits?

Whilst it is highlighted else where on this site, I have presented the main benefits of an OWA antenna below:

• Wide Bandwidth meaning one antenna and service large portions (or all) of the required band
• Very low SWR meaning minimum return losses
• Near 50 Ohm impedance and therefore limited radiation or losses in 50 Ohm feed coax
• No Matching arrangement at the feed point of the antenna meaning easy construction with direct coaxial feed
• Having no match, no power limits for the antenna. Power input is limited by the feed coax only
• Very easy construction and self build capabilities as a result of the above
• Last and maybe most important - Due to its design, small errors when building WILL NOT drastically affect final performance

What are Quad benefits over a Yagi?

Typically, the real and fundamental benefits are in outright performance. With a quad (below around 7/8 elements) you will see higher gain and better front to back ratio that a Yagi of any given Boom length. In most cases, higher gain can be produced with not just a shorter boom, with less elements too.

What Are the G0KSC OWA Quad benefits?

All of the above! With my Quads you will see all of the OWA Yagi benefits with a shorter boom and less elements any a given Yagi design.

If you like the idea of an OWA quad and do not see something on this site that suits, let me know and I maybe able to model something for you.

Any questions at all, please mail me.

73 Justin G0KSC